Web strategic planning, an organizational solution
Monday morning, client meeting for the launch of a Web strategic planning project. We explain our vision, we talk about its Web strategy , its team, its site. The client expresses the same desolation that I often hear: his site is outdated, he presents their service offer badly because nobody manages it and, finally, all the units want to be on the home page. Unfortunately, poor web strategies are direct consequences of poor work organization.
Western structures are based on the principle of specialization initiated by Taylor (geography, division, product, business function), where each unit has a defined role and tasks to perform. The consequence is the famous management in a vacuum which affects the management of the site : the lack of collaboration between the units on the content or the functionalities to be developed or the exacerbated power games. It is the most influential who arbitrarily chooses what should be put forward on the site, and the absence of a common vision is obviously felt. The webmaster receives unexpected and urgent orders that break his production rhythm. The information architecture is more often than not a layer of the organization chart. Take the test: take a large company's website and look at its organization chart; the corollary is often striking.
Seeing the problem, the manager decides to plan a redesign of his website. He mandates operational people to carry out the project with their favorite web advice box. He expects to be presented with the best practices for his site, to have the best CMS which will ensure the decentralization of powers, which will solve all past problems. Everyone will be able to create their sections, their pages. All this will reduce the workload of the webmaster in command of the units. By giving the keys to the management of the site to the different business units, it is believed that they will respect the information architecture and the planned strategy. It's beautiful and simple in theory, but in practice, we are far from wishful thinking. Some resources have been designated by their unit to manage the content of the site, but given the current context, their work overload prevents them from carrying out their new tasks. Human resources managers had not been consulted in order to redefine their position. The additional workload is therefore set aside or evaded, not for lack of will, but for lack of room for manoeuvre. The return of the vicious circle.
WHAT TO DO NOW?
IDENTIFY THE PROBLEM AT THE SOURCE
A strategic web planning is not just a website redesign , it is a redesign of the organizational processes in place.. By knowing the impact of your web strategy on your business, you will know the resources available and the degree of input required for content production. For example, you want to better advise your customers online through a chat function from 9:00 a.m. to 9:00 p.m., 7 days a week. The chat requires the availability of one or more resources to ensure the service quality. Do you have resources who know how to express themselves in writing and who are able to adequately understand the technology? Should the people in place be trained? Can/should you commit new resources? These considerations must be taken into account before the production of the site, otherwise it will be doomed to live only a short time before becoming obsolete.
When the common vision is defined and the structure is more collaborative, the Web strategy can be put in place. Subsequently, the processes for planning and updating the content must be defined in addition to training the people responsible for each unit. They will see to autonomy and respect for the strategy put in place.
LEGITIMIZE THE CONTRIBUTION OF THE WEB TEAM
The Web, for many SMEs, has recently been considered as a link in the value chain rather than an element added to the marketing plan. The web team, often made up of just one person – a webmaster or the IT guy in the box – needs to move from a centralized drop-off point for all web requests to a holistic view of the company's service offering. company. This is a challenge in itself and I will expose, in a future article, the 5 types of work organizations to manage your Web strategy .
Expertises évoquées
(SizeLimitingPyList: [Business Strategy, Business])TechHow-ToBusinessBusiness StrategyPaid Media & SEMAnalytics & TrackingClient experience & UXContent & SEOSocial MediaInnovationDigital transformationE-commerceData Science & AI MarketingAdvisoOpinionsArtificial Intelligence MarketingSeriesCustomer-centric marketingContentProject ManagementUnderstand the impactsAcquiring durable audiencesEmail marketingGDPRAI MarketingCookie ApocalypsePersonalizing the customer experienceRaise awarenessCreating a value exchange programMarTechMarketing AutomationMeasuring and optimizing initiativesPrivate: Cookie ApocalypseBrandingFacebook AnalyticsLoyaltyOne-on-oneCOMMERCECtrl+A | A Podcast About Digital StrategyFacebook AnalyticsFind solutionsInnovationInsiderSecret weaponsTHOMA DANEAUWebinars
You May Also Like
These Related Stories
-Mar-31-2026-03-33-38-9390-PM.jpg)
The 5 main performance indicators for a site intended for lead generation (1 of 2)
We are often asked THE question by our clients/partners/colleagues/bosses: What are the main performance indicators to check in the management of my website? However, their selection is greatly influenced by the vocation of the website, because each has a unique strategy and objectives of its own. In order to answer this fundamental question as humbly as possible, I will publish a series of posts that will identify the 5 main performance indicators for 3 types of business model on the Internet.

5 types of work organization to manage your web strategy
I was explaining yesterday that Web strategic planning is not just a technical question, but also a question of work organization. Over the past few years, we have met several clients and partners who have very different work organizations. Often, it has been noticed that the structure in place influences the complexity of the website. The more the team is multidisciplinary, the more the Web offer is well defined. Here are the 5 typical types of organization of companies in the management of web strategies .

ROI no matter what the cost
Since the start of the pandemic, we’ve noticed an intensification of requests that produce immediate results and aggressive return on investment from our clients. While expectations of digital performance have always been very high, it was common practice to divide digital marketing budgets between a company’s strategic, structural projects and those that aimed at quickly generating sales. The goal of this strategy was to generate immediate returns for the company while promoting a long-term vision for its digital assets. For several months, many companies have been undergoing restructuring that has had a direct impact on their internal capabilities. This restructuring has also led to slowdowns in the development of longer term marketing assets. Since these projects would normally develop slowly over time, it’s taking longer for the effects on these companies’ gross revenue and net results to be perceptible. The truth is that, in many cases, there’s a huge amount of internal pressure t …
Repérer et valoriser ce qui compte vraiment.
Recevez nos analyses et conseils pour rester à l’avant-garde du numérique.