Having a word in Exact and Broad on Adwords: useless?
I'd like to close the discussion about using multiple targeting options for the same keyword (i.e. having keyword123 as "broad" in addition to having keyword123 as "exact") . In the vast majority of cases, this approach is unnecessary.
Here's why :
First, let's go back and consider the 2 competing theories:
1. Put very popular keywords in “broad” and “exact” to increase their performance
2. Keep only the “broad” option
So I did a test with one of our big customers to see what was going on:

Obviously, the test was not conducted over the same period so external factors may have affected the validity of the data. The fact remains that the results are surprising: a 24% increase in the click rate when the word is in “broad” only!!! wow!
It was enough for me to contact Google for this purpose. The response I received is along the same lines as my conclusions… but for different reasons. The personal opinion of my contact at Google can be summed up in two points:
1. There is no performance advantage
2. It increases management complexity
In my own book, that concludes the question!
Note that if you used two targeting options in order to have more details on the conversion of a word, the “Search Query Performance report” can meet this need without problems. In addition, this report also makes it easy to identify keywords to exclude from campaigns when they use keywords in “broad” mode.
Finally, the last and only reason I would use two targeting options for the same keyword would be to set different bids. This could apply for clients in highly competitive industries for extremely popular words. But again here I really wonder if the increase in performance is really tangible.
Do you have any real-life experiences with using multiple targeting options for the same keyword?
Interesting fact: The “quality score” of an “exact” or “broad” word is identical because it is the exact version of the “broad” word that is used to calculate the “quality score”. Note that the difference in performance between "broad" and "exact" (CTR and CPC) is explained by the aggregation of all variations of a keyword in "broad" and not by different "quality scores".
Share this
You May Also Like
These Related Stories

Tame the Google AdWords Keyword Planner for your search trends
The appearance of Google's Keyword Planner tool heralds the imminent demise of the widely used Google AdWords Keyword Tool. Although this new tool seems more focused on creating AdWords advertising campaigns (logical, since it is a merger between Keyword Tool and Traffic Estimator), it is still possible to use it in the same way as before to analyze search trends, except for a few details.
-2-Apr-02-2026-08-04-40-6112-PM.jpg)
Paying for branded searches? Who would want to do that? Me.
I was reading an interesting article by Jennifer Robertson from Search Engine Land on PPC branded keywords. To buy branded or not buy branded keywords on search engines is always a dilemma, the issue being that usually these keywords rank well on natural search page results. Clients rarely enjoy seeing we’ve spend a significant portion of their paid search on their branded keywords because of that, something that it very understandable. What Jennifer was saying though makes complete sense: buying branded keywords can help build your account’s history, dominate search pages and more. Sometimes this strategy can be a good investment.

5 reasons to buy your brand’s keywords on Google
Targeting brand keywords* in search marketing is a simple, cost-effective tactic that could have a very interesting strategic influence on the brand.
Repérer et valoriser ce qui compte vraiment.
Recevez nos analyses et conseils pour rester à l’avant-garde du numérique.